Important New Rules for IRA Rollovers - Rodgers & Associates

Important New Rules for IRA Rollovers


Many advisers were taken by surprise with the U.S. Tax Court’s recent ruling on IRA rollovers. In Bobrow v. Commis­sioner, (T.C. Memo. 2014–21), the Tax Court held the one IRA rollover per year rules applies to all the IRA accounts of a taxpayer collec­tively. Not to each IRA account individ­ually. This ruling is contrary to the long-standing inter­pre­tation of IRS Publi­cation 590’s statement to the contrary.

The Internal Revenue Code allows taxpayers to take a distri­b­ution from an IRA and avoid tax conse­quences by rolling the funds over to an IRA within 60 days. The tax code permits one IRA rollover in a 12-month period. Prior to the Tax Court’s ruling, the one rollover per year rule was inter­preted to apply to IRAs on an account-by-account basis. A taxpayer with several IRA accounts could take a 60-day rollover from each account allowing multiple IRA rollovers in a 12-month period. The new ruling applies the 1 per year IRA rollover rule in the aggregate across all IRAs, inval­i­dating the separate IRA rollover treatment.

This ruling has no impact on direct transfers between IRA accounts or rollovers from an employer’s plan to an IRA. In these trans­ac­tions, the taxpayer never touches the money. A trustee-to-trustee transfer is the best way for IRA money to be moved from one IRA to another. The money goes directly from one IRA custodian to another. There is no 60-day deadline and the once-per-year rule does not apply. IRA owners may continue to make as many direct transfers as they like.

The ruling has no impact on Roth conver­sions. When funds are converted from an IRA or employer plan (401(k), 403(b), etc.) to a Roth IRA, indirectly using the 60-day rollover, the conversion does not count as a rollover for purposes of the once-per-year rule.   IRA rechar­ac­ter­i­za­tions are also not affected by the ruling.

The tax conse­quences of not following the new ruling can be severe. Attempting to make more than one IRA-to-IRA or Roth IRA-to-Roth IRA rollover within a 12-month period will result in the second distri­b­ution being considered a taxable distri­b­ution. The 10% penalty for early distri­b­u­tions will apply if the taxpayer is under age 59 ½ when the trans­action occurs. While the IRS has the authority to waive the 60-day rollover rule, it may not waive the once-a-year IRA-to-IRA rollover rule. Finally, the funds from the second distri­b­ution will become subject to the 6% excess contri­bution penalty if the taxpayer allows them to remain within an IRA. The 6% penalty will apply to each year the excess remains in the IRA account.

The bottom line from the new ruling is any rollover from any IRA cancels the oppor­tunity for any other IRA rollovers within a 12-month period. This period starts on the date when the first distri­b­ution occurs from the first IRA. If an IRA rollover occurs from one IRA, the taxpayer cannot do another rollover from that IRA or a different one until the 12-month period is past.

The IRS acknowl­edged that this ruling is a signif­icant departure from the standard view of IRS Publi­cation 590’s rollover limitation. Because of its signif­i­cance, the IRS says it will not apply the ruling to any rollover that involves an IRA distri­b­ution occurring before January 1, 2015. In effect, the new ruling doesn’t start until next year.

The new ruling is a poten­tially costly tax trap. Taxpayers should do a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer when moving funds between IRAs. This type of transfer is not considered a rollover and therefore not subject to the once-per-year problems. If you must do a rollover, pay close attention to the trans­action date to make sure the 12-month period has passed before attempting another rollover.

Rick’s Tips:

  • A recent Tax Court ruling allows only one IRA rollover within a 12-month period from all of a taxpayer’s IRA accounts.
  • The second rollover within 12-months will be deemed distributed and subject to tax and possibly penalties.
  • Roth conver­sions are not subject to the new ruling.